Reacciones de un grupo familiar de Lechucita de las Vizcacheras (Athene cunicularia) a drones y rapaces

Laura Borsellino; Natalia Rebolo Ifrán

doi:10.56178/na.vi62.221

Artículos Publicado 01 diciembre 2017 https://doi.org/10.56178/na.vi62.221

Reacciones de un grupo familiar de Lechucita de las Vizcacheras (Athene cunicularia) a drones y rapaces

Athene cunicularia Lechucita de las Vizcacheras Drones Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires rapaces Comportamiento antidepredatorio

Laura Borsellino Avenida del Tejar 3699, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (1430), Argentina

Natalia Rebolo Ifrán Grupo de Investigaciones en Biología de la Conservación (GRINBIC), Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA (CONICET— Universidad Nacional del Comahue), Quintral 1250, Bariloche (8400), Argentina

Resumen

Este artículo no cuenta con un resumen.

PDF

Referencias

Borsellino L (2014) Nidificación del Halconcito colorado (Falco sparverius) y del Gavilán mixto (Parabuteo unicinctus) en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Nótulas Faunísticas Segunda Serie 161: 1–11.
Chabot D & Bird DM (2012) Evaluation of an off-the-shelf unmanned aircraft system for surveying flocks of geese. Waterbirds 35: 170–174.
Diehl R (2013) The airspace is habitat. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 377–379.
Drewitt A & Langston R (2006) Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148: 29–42.
Gallacher D (2015) Drones to manage the urban environment. Risks, rewards, alternatives. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 115–124.
Junda J, Greene E, Zazelenchuk D & Bird DM (2016) Nest defense behaviour of four raptor species (Osprey, Bald Eagle, Ferruginous Hawk and Red-tailed Hawk) to a novel aerial intruder – a small rotary-winged drone. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 217–227.
Klem D (2014) Landscape, legal, and biodiversity threats that windows pose to birds: a review of an important conservation issue. Land 3: 351–361.
Lambertucci S, Shepard E & Wilson R (2015) Human-wildlife conflicts in a crowded airspace. Science 348: 502–504.
Martin D (1973) Selected aspects of Burrowing Owl ecology and behavior. Condor 75: 446–456.
Martin GR (2011) Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis 153: 239–254.
McEvoy JF, Hall GP & McDonald PG (2016) Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4: e1831.
Rodríguez A, Negro J, Mulero M, Rodríguez C, Hernández-Pliego J & Bustamante J (2012) The eye in the sky: combined use of unmanned aerial systems and GPS data loggers for ecological research and conservation of small birds. PLoS ONE 7: e50336.
Vas E, Lescroel A, Duriez O, Boguszewski G & Gremillet D (2015) Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters 11: 20140754.
Weissensteiner M, Poelstra J & Wolf J (2015) Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 46: 425–430

Cómo citar

Laura Borsellino, Natalia Rebolo Ifrán (2017). Reacciones de un grupo familiar de Lechucita de las Vizcacheras (Athene cunicularia) a drones y rapaces. Nuestras Aves, Núm. 62 (2017), 61-63. https://doi.org/10.56178/na.vi62.221

Descargas

330Visualizaciones del texto completo

1Formatos

Licencia: CC BY-NC 4.0

[1] Borsellino L (2014) Nidificación del Halconcito colorado (Falco sparverius) y del Gavilán mixto (Parabuteo unicinctus) en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Nótulas Faunísticas Segunda Serie 161: 1–11.

[2] Chabot D & Bird DM (2012) Evaluation of an off-the-shelf unmanned aircraft system for surveying flocks of geese. Waterbirds 35: 170–174.

[3] Diehl R (2013) The airspace is habitat. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 377–379.

[4] Drewitt A & Langston R (2006) Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148: 29–42.

[5] Gallacher D (2015) Drones to manage the urban environment. Risks, rewards, alternatives. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 115–124.

[6] Junda J, Greene E, Zazelenchuk D & Bird DM (2016) Nest defense behaviour of four raptor species (Osprey, Bald Eagle, Ferruginous Hawk and Red-tailed Hawk) to a novel aerial intruder – a small rotary-winged drone. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 217–227.

[7] Klem D (2014) Landscape, legal, and biodiversity threats that windows pose to birds: a review of an important conservation issue. Land 3: 351–361.

[8] Lambertucci S, Shepard E & Wilson R (2015) Human-wildlife conflicts in a crowded airspace. Science 348: 502–504.

[9] Martin D (1973) Selected aspects of Burrowing Owl ecology and behavior. Condor 75: 446–456.

[10] Martin GR (2011) Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis 153: 239–254.

[11] McEvoy JF, Hall GP & McDonald PG (2016) Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4: e1831.

[12] Rodríguez A, Negro J, Mulero M, Rodríguez C, Hernández-Pliego J & Bustamante J (2012) The eye in the sky: combined use of unmanned aerial systems and GPS data loggers for ecological research and conservation of small birds. PLoS ONE 7: e50336.

[13] Vas E, Lescroel A, Duriez O, Boguszewski G & Gremillet D (2015) Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters 11: 20140754.

[14] Weissensteiner M, Poelstra J & Wolf J (2015) Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 46: 425–430